Showing posts with label knowing when you've lost. Show all posts
Showing posts with label knowing when you've lost. Show all posts

Sipkin, Antonelli/News, Mordovets/Getty

I had two friends in college who, during overlapping eras, were generally considered the flyest sisters on campus. They both pretended to not know this while wielding their power.

One sister had them flocking from the summer before her orientation. Facebook was still a novelty then but fellas knew enough to use it like Mel Kiper’s Big Board. Her everyday photos were the talk of the town, upperclassmen and incoming students alike undoubtedly anticipated their chance.

I was in a relationship at the time and viewed the sister as just that. I had no intentions toward her, having known her from the independent school circles back home (where one of my homeboys ADORED her), it was just cool that she was coming to Davidson. As wholesome as I was, even I subconsciously engaged in the free agent pursuit.*

Now, I told you that I knew everybody was going after her but it wasn’t until one particular evening that I realized how absurd it really was. I went down to her dorm room to see how she was doing and literally saw a line of brothers waiting to chop it up. Her fineness transformed a dorm room into the DMV.

She was braiding one guy’s hair (the frontrunner at the time), getting help with class from another, talking about music with a third, and getting invited to a step show by a fourth! Having known her the longest (and still having no untoward feelings, consciously at least) I stepped past the crowd and exchanged pleasantries. The intrigue had its ebb and flow; (it’s not like she got less fine) but no one really succeeded (I define success in this situation as being a publicly acknowledged situation). Many found solace in saying “whatever” but still found time to ridicule her ex-boyfriend—another student—for letting her get away.

This episode taught me a valuable lesson that I want to share with you in light of the Carmelo Anthony situation. Teams, like thirsty upperclassmen, often fail to realize when they are being used. They might have valuable assets but it’s all about timing.

Let’s take the Nets for example. Do they have a bright future? Absolutely. Young players, cap flexibility, draft picks (and the win drought that guarantees the quality of those picks) and the eventual move to the county of Kings. And it is those things, save Brooklyn, that they are offering for Melo’s services. If he did wind up in Newark, is Carmelo really getting anything better than what he had in Denver?** No.

For longtime Art Stars, y’all know I’m a Knicks fan til eternity. Bias aside, Melo makes sense for the Knicks. It took me a while—had to let the burns heal—but I’ve talked myself into the proposed trade of Felton, Gallo, Eddy Curry’s snacks, and Chandler for Melo, Billups, and etc. I really believe this trade lets us walk away with a better team for the playoffs and Billups will be washed up right in time for us to chase Deron Williams. (I want no parts of Chris Paul’s knees. Him and Amar’e will look like a couple of Golden Girls by the time that arthritis sets in.)

It’s not even like Melo on the Nets makes them a threat. They’re being used. (In this analogy Denver is the girl and Melo is said girl’s fineness.) The Nets are driving up the price to the point where the Knicks (if Jim Dolan can find somewhere to sit down and shut the hell up) might have to say, “You alright but…nah I’m good.”

Without the Nets being so thirsty, the Knicks could just wait til free agency and give Melo a max offer under the new Collective Bargaining Agreement. But just like all the brothers in the dorm room, the Knicks are gonna have to do a little bit more to stand out.

Which sucks.***

But I understand where the Nets are coming from. Melo is a great player and if you can make the move for him, you’ve got to, right? I’m reminded of the many times I’ve chased a girl that a friend of mine also fancied. The second girl, aforementioned in the first paragraph, created a rivalry between one of my homeboys and I. I didn’t stand a chance but kept on trying, unfortunately driving up the price for him. He ended up with her and now they are far from friends. I kept it moving with my proverbial draft picks (read: my dignity and sanity) and will be married in June.

Peace.

*At least that’s how the lady I was with saw it. Perhaps this was because I—once again, subconsciously—walked my own girlfriend off the sidewalk to talk to her or would end arguments by saying, “Screw this, I’m gonna go see how (aforementioned sister) is doin!”

**Aside from helping to create a murderer's row of player's wives/girlfriends (Kim Kardashian, LaLa, and occassional visits from Beyonce is a legendary lineup)

***This is not like LeBron being a free agent and every team having a right to throw their hat in. Melo ain’t even that good. And the Nets are the only ones messing this up for my squad!****

****If the Nets really do mess this up for the Knicks by either obtaining him or making us trade everybody but Amar’e and Spike, I hereby renounce New Jersey. It’s that real.



Of a table of nine freshmen, we were the only two people laughing. Our group took pause from their food to shoot us ”the look,” but we only smiled at each other and resumed normal conversation. The sudden outpouring of mirth wasn’t because either of us had said anything funny, but that we had just realized that we could understand each other. For the rest of the night Devyn and I exchanged smiles, giggles, and secret glances – we connected, and even at eighteen we knew how much that was worth. The next day I was talking to my best friend, Katherine, and asked her for the scoop about Devyn. It turned out Devyn had a very cute boyfriend in Steven, another freshmen that she’d seen since high school, and that it was “very serious.” I was very disappointed: one minute it’s jokes over quesadillas, the next minute your future girlfriend is already spoken for and halfway to the altar. I couldn’t brood for too long, though, because what Katherine said next would change my life: “Don’t worry, I think I have a plan.”

As a teenager, I was profoundly influenced by the coming of age masterpiece Cruel Intentions. It was what I aspired towards (I was not a good person then, and if I were 18 now I am sure my hero would be Gossip Girl’s Chuck Bass). Katherine knew this and presented me with a plan that would make Sarah and Ryan proud. She had her own crush on Steven, and proposed that we worked together to break them up, and then both collect the respective prizes. I loved the idea, the intrigue, and the possible rewards. I was to befriend Steven and she would become friends with Devyn. Then we would all hang out and seduce our targets, and afterwards insinuate to our new “friends” that college is a time for exploring and trying new things and that they shouldn’t limit themselves. We played our parts well and soon wrought friction and misplaced romantic tension in the newly doomed relationship, while Devyn and I coddled our connection, oblivious to looming disaster. You never expect your best laid plans to come to fruition at a Waffle House.

Granted, I had never been to a Waffle House before college. I always had considered it to be the dirty shady cousin of IHOP. Katherine was a huge Waffle House fan or as she preferred to say “WaHo.” Katherine would insist that we go to WaHo after studying at least every couple weeks, and on this occasion she suggested we invite Devyn and Steven. Inviting them to dinner was risky, and the reward came sooner than expected: Devyn caught my eye, licked her lips, and made a sort of smacking sound. I was shocked that she would do something so clearly flirtatious in front of her boyfriend, but also took it as sort of a challenge. I caught her eye and repeated her lip smack except in a way that was even more overtly salacious. By this time Katherine and Steven had noticed that something was going on between us. I don’t know if Devyn had had too much syrup or if the greasy aroma of onions and cheese had gone to her head, but she gives me a “you are not about to out flirt me, I am a sexy woman and you are just a boy, and to hell if my boyfriend is sitting directly across from me” glance, and then holding my gaze runs her soft, long tongue languorously over her lips and smacks them loudly at me.

The mood at the table was tense. Steven looked at his girlfriend and then looked at me and then back at his girlfriend. Even Katherine shot me a “what the hell are you doing” look. The moment passed, we paid for our meal and left. Later that week Devyn and Steven broke up, and that weekend I met Devyn at a house semi-formal. I told her that I was really sorry about her breakup, to which she said that she was sorry about mine (yes during this time I was dating someone else -- I warned you I wasn’t a good guy). I don’t know if it was the long building sexual tension between us or just our general connection at that time, but what we did wasn’t just dancing – it was foreplay. The next day I woke up with mono.

I always wonder how different my life would have been if I never got mono. I was socially side-lined for the entire month of November, and all of my hard work of September and October fell to the wayside. Devyn couldn’t take me to her house semi-formal because I was too sick to attend. I couldn’t kiss any new girls because I didn’t want to give them mono, so I end up getting back with the girl I had broken up with and who I would date on an off again for 2.5 years. In a surprising twist, Steven and I actually became really good friends. We both were big basketball fans and would go to the home games together; we didn’t miss a game the entire season. I felt bad for trying to steal his girlfriend, but I never told Steven anything about the plan, and soon forgot about the whole ordeal.

That spring, I invited Steven to meet my best friend, Rush, for a drink. Rush and I were up to our usual tricks: talking fast, laughing louder, and telling increasingly ridiculous stories, including one about a beautiful, half-naked runner coming into Rush’s room to deliver a box of homemade cookies, and then leaving without saying one word.

“Do you remember who I ran into after I left your room?”

”Wasn’t it Devyn?”

I felt Steven lift his head to look at me, so I quickly denied it and tried desperately to catch Rush’s eye to let him know to drop the subject. I was too late, and my best friend steamrolled ahead, “Well I would have thought it was Devyn. Haven’t you always liked her?”

Steven is looking straight at me, and I weakly reply “Yes.”

The room fell to complete silence. Steven looks at me, looks back down, takes out his cell phone, opens it, looks at me, closes it, and says “I think I am getting a call, I’m going to go now.” It never rang. Steven and I were never friends again.


With all respect to Ms. Bowman, control may be the game, but I don't think any of our antiheroes is in it at the moment. As Walt grows aggressive in his fight to preserve his family, Jesse more desperate to stay some shred of sanity, and Hank more afraid of his own inadequacies, shit's likely to get real. Things will spiral so far past that point of inevitability that the moment everyone reaps their harvest will probably be one of the more memorable series of events ever shown on TV -- and you know how I try and use hyperbole responsibly.

Sundays episode, "I.F.T.," was, of course, outstanding. With the deliberate momentum the show builds, its hard to make a misstep at this pace. Not much action aside from a nice and bloody barfight -- Hank kicking the shit out of two larger bikers made me wanna throw some blows myself -- but again, considering how the episode was more introspective than explicative, not much was needed; Gilligan and company are stacking bricks for now. Bricks like:

Walt finalizing his move back in through outmaneuvering Skyler's threat of police intervention. She still called him in, but Walt put on all the right moves in the officers' presence to appear as perfect as possible at the exact wrong moment. I'm no expert on the accurate portrayal of the abused family dynamic, but I think it was well done here. Skyler's sense of powerlessness was pretty palpable, and the scene itself avoided feeling cliche, despite toeing the line a few times. As much as I love some Walter, it was hard not to feel like he'd gone too far here. I'm actually interested in seeing the cooking operation go back online, if only to watch how the business dynamic changes, but having the head chef play so handily into his desperation makes me think he might not get a chance to reunite with Jesse in the RV after all. As Skyler's lawyer says, "drug dealers have a way of getting caught," and Walt can't get much more reckless before he irreparably screws up.

The tension's got our anti's showing some regrettable personal tics. Jesse has been calling Jane's voicemail, maybe several times an hour, just to sate the profound loneliness thats surely been burning a hole through his gut. We can all empathize with his sinking feeling when the number finally gets disconnected -- the sting from losing that last link. Hank gets his El Paso gig back, but clearly has doubts. The panic attacks could prove debilitating unless he does something drastic to get over them, something like smashing a dealer's teeth in on a countertop. Skyler's smoking again (same room as the baby, no less), but the shoe really drops when she reveals what the episode title acronym really means.

"I fucked Ted."

I had my doubts on just how much Walt's heavy-hearted confession over how every dollar in that duffel bag weighed on him would affect her, and clearly his regret wasn't enough to reset the marriage dynamic. How could it be? So yes, she fucks Ted, and Anna Gunn sells the internal conflict behind reaching out for something, anything (even if it's just a revenge fuck), pretty well. Here's the thing, was telling Walt a satisfying release, or just welcoming another burden? More importantly, if Skyler's dilemma is a microcosm of this season's entire thematic stance, will coming clean save any of our characters? Maybe there really isn't a way out.

I'll keep this short, as I'm sure you people are tired of hearing me blab on about love and shit (I'll be talking about The Matrix next).


Pragmatism isn't charming. It isn't hopeful though it tells you to hope, it's not consoling though it may help you grieve, it doesn't tell you that you really can get everything you want if you just fight hard enough, although it keeps you fighting anyway, and if you believe that you really do deserve to be loved just as much as the next person, pragmatism is waiting with a needle for your luftballons, "not everyone will find what they want." This said, playing Devil's Advocate on Holden's behalf, what's so wrong with trying to build that happy ending anyway?

The best thing about Chasing Amy - the source of its charm - is how, though the methods may be precious, Kevin Smith takes us fully within the conflicts that threaten the central relationship. With every sentence, the characters define in certain terms where their heads and hearts are, and speak to precisely what's tormenting them, even if they're being obtuse. In that atmosphere of such naked honesty, what's wrong with wanting everything to resolve into something more Disney than Daria? We all know how things are likely to end in the real world, how every committed romance is sure to be hard-won but littered with nothing-fights, miscommunication, unrequited feelings and nasty breakups. We also know how sincerely beautiful loving someone else can be; why not choose the latter?

In terms of Holden's comic, I don't think it represents a "thriving obsession with failed fantasy," as much as it does a bittersweet reality that while people may grow, they never really change. Holden moves past the stage where he desperately craves their triptych happy ending, but - and you can see it when he looks back at Alyssa one more time before literally "closing the door" on that chapter of their life - a part of him still wants their bond to be amiable. Honestly, there's nothing wrong with that.


In a victory for deluded narcissists everywhere, Lindsay Lohan has won her lawsuit--and her $100 million settlement--against E-Trade for appropriating the name "Lindsay" in its "milkaholic" Super Bowl babies commercial. The lawsuit went all the way to the Supreme Court, where Justice Scalia, in a surprise 9-0 ruling in Lohan's favor, wrote for the court, "Lohan deserves the chance to mock herself; she needs no help from E-Trade." Justice Thomas remained silent on the matter.

Original video below:

by Amy Kristen


I simply couldn’t fight it. Every particle in my body was pulling me towards him: he drew me in with his eyes, his smile, his donut-scented jacket. I couldn’t say no, even though the angel on my shoulder was turning red in the face from screaming in my ear. I knew it was wrong. He had a girlfriend. She was far off in another city, but they had been together for four years. He loved her, a fact that he repeated to me frequently. But still, he pursued me fast and furiously, so much so that I could not send him away.

Our meeting was almost perfect, despite the fact that we were both in committed relationships at the time. We were working on a student film together, and on the first day of rehearsals the director asked the two of us to stand in for the actors. Before I even knew his hometown, I was hugging this boy, taking in his scent, marveling at the electricity passing between us as we embraced. We stayed in this position for a few minutes as the director paced around us, discussing shots set-ups with the cinematographer. He and I spoke in each other’s ears, and I was captivated; never before had I experienced such an intense physical attraction to a boy. Especially not my current boyfriend.

He and I became close friends. He was my confidant, and we took to sneaking off together during lulls in filming to go for long walks in the night air. I bared to him my soul, and he gave me back massages when I grew tired. I kept denying that there was anything going on between us, despite the fact that I’d broken up with my loser boyfriend and was an aching, lonely soul.

I met her once. He brought her to set one day, proudly showing her off. It was eerie how much she looked like me. Same frame, same curly hair, same glasses. Except she had a nice rack, whereas I am flat-chested. She was “beautiful,” as he described her. Her name was Anna.

I hated her.

She, in my opinion, was hideous - the ugliest, most deplorable female I had ever laid eyes on. I couldn’t bring myself to talk to her, but instead chose to glare at her from across the room. Look how happy he is. Look how happy SHE is. I wanted to vomit, and then I wanted to take my clenched fist and ram it straight into the side of her ugly little head. I wanted to tear her apart. I wanted her to suffer.

Despite the fact that he had paraded his trophy girlfriend around in front of me, he would not leave me alone. And I was all too eager to push her out of my mind and let him in. He began to visit me at my apartment. It was always very innocent, at first. We would watch a movie. We would talk. And then he would tell me how beautiful I was.

I fell into his trap without thinking. Before I could reflect on my actions, we were holding hands. Then we were lying down in my bed, staring into each other’s eyes in awe. Then we were standing on my rooftop, underneath the sparkling stars, touching foreheads as I wished with all my heart for him to tell me he and his girlfriend were breaking up.

They weren’t breaking up. He loved her, he reminded me.

Then he began touching me, feeling me, sending shivers of sensation up and down my body. It was intoxicating, and I fell under his spell as he grabbed me and drew me to him. He kissed me, passionately (I’m wanted! I’m wanted! …my pathetically insecure mind exclaimed with glee), and then he leaned down and whispered in my ear, confirming all of my hopes: “I want you.”

I threw myself at him, gave him everything I could, desperate to prove how superior I was to that deplorable creature he called his girlfriend. Night after night I cast away all my reason and set out to complete my mission to make him forget her altogether.

We did not discuss the problem at all. Weeks went by, and he still had that vile little girl waiting for him in Irvine. Sometimes she would call while we were together. Part of me died every time.

Finally, he confessed to me that he had a history of cheating on his girlfriends. That girl I loathed, miles away? She had helped him cheat on his previous girlfriend. At one point in high school, he was sleeping with three different girls at the same time, without their knowledge. It figured: he was charming, talkative, wild with sex. The quintessential player.

One day, he came to my door, eyes ablaze. His stone gaze spoke of nothing but hatred. Quietly, he informed me that he had finally broken up with Anna, who he still deeply loved. And it was my fault.

I stayed with that boy. He had ensnared me so tightly that I could not let go, so I stayed by his side, even during the period of time when he could not look at me because I had caused him to cry. He cried when he broke up with her. He’s only ever cried three times in his entire life.

Months later, we were in the throes of happiness. We spent the long summer days together, building on that spark that drew us together. I envisioned my future with him, the darkness of the origins of our relationship fading into a dream. I was floating.

Then, one night, we were making love with more intensity than ever before. It was blissful and wonderful how close we had become, how deeply I loved him.

I told him so, and he replied, without pausing, without thinking: “I love you too, Anna.”

















Ever walk out the house, feeling alright, trying not to pay attention to the little warning in the back of your mind, when suddenly this happens?

I think we're gonna be ok.



How does it feel to put in your all and have it not be enough?/Instead of all full, you're awful and it's so damn tough- Chris B. "Lyrics of Fury 2k5" circa 2004.*


Although I am ecstatic that Usain continues his dominance, my heart goes out to Tyson Gay. He's a great athlete but this rivalry is becoming more and more uneven. He ran a 9.71 in Berlin and no one cares! It's the third best time ever! I probably don't have to tell you who has the top two times...

That brother needs some serious pastoral care.

How was he supposed to know that his career would serve as a footnote in the story of the once in a century phenomenon known as Usain "Lightning" Bolt?!

And I thought lightning wasn't supposed to strike twice, eh? How many times can one man break his own record...and barely look like he's trying.**

Let's just say Tyson was born in 1974 instead of 1982. Still had the same conditioning, resources, and everything that has made him the athlete he is today. Is there any question about his potential stardom then?

He'd be the guy Michael Johnson hands the torch to in 2000. Triumphant enough in 2004 for America to soon forget the doping scandals that were to come. His rivalry with Bolt would be bigger and he might not even play second fiddle.

This would be a "changing of the guard" story rather than what it is now. A tale we've seen so often in sports. A legend decimating the best of the mortals.

Ali did this to Frazier.

Jordan to Barkley, Ewing, Drexler, Malone, and anyone else in his path.

And now Gay must pay the price. He's playing Salieri to Bolt's Mozart.

Yesterday on Twitter I called Tyson the Patrick Ewing of track. This prompted a debate as some felt that it implied Bolt was Jordanesque.***

A friend of mine, obvious Jordan worshiper, offered that the most he could do was compare Bolt to LeBron. I scoffed at this because while I think LeBron will be the G.O.A.T, he isn't yet. Bolt is more than potential. He is now.

But don't let me argue for him, in Bolt's own words:

usainboltI was made for speed - 9.58 - how do you like that - to the world

usainboltWho faster?


*Yeah I quoted myself. Kinda cocky I suppose. But this is a story about Usain Bolt so humility must be scarce. Oh yeah, here's the referenced track.

**No really. Have you seen this?

***Which is exactly what I meant.






The surreal state of shock is still in the atmosphere.

I was on my way to the Garden on Thursday, to pick up the vibes outside as everyone anticipated the NBA Draft. Walking down 34th, I felt the buzz start to pick up as news of Michael Jackson's health started to spread. Street vendors stopping people on the street to let them know he suffered cardiac arrest. By the time I got in front of the Garden, I heard scalpers proclaim, "How am I supposed to sell this stuff? The King is dead." Yet still, I didn't want to believe it. I noticed a lag in my cell phone's network as I sent out texts asking about this news, assuming many others were doing the same. As my frat brother made his way down the street to me we both blurted out "Did you hear?!"

And by that time it was confirmed. My Mom returned my phone call, with tears in her voice, "Christopher, he's gone." In the same voice, no doubt, she'd use if a family member had passed. I didn't want to accept it, and in many ways spent this whole weekend denying it, but an icon who very much framed the expectations my generation has for icons, is gone.

For us 80s babies, who are too young to remember Thriller but too old to forget images of people fainting at his concerts, Michael Jackson has been a constant. In many ways, understanding his death is like hearing that the Sun just died. Of course he's mortal but don't front like you too didn't wonder, "Michael Jackson is dead?"

I can't remember any celebrity whose death has stopped the world like this. We've felt shock, and even horror, but I have never seen so many people take it this personally. There are reports of Times Square groaning as the crowd read the breaking news. Over the weekend I've realized how so many moments in my life had the King of Pop's influence.

Watching concerts on video. Countless attempts at Moonwalking. Friends dressed up as Michael Jackson for Halloween (one Halloween where three girls dressed up as Moonwalker, Mike from Thriller, and "Off the Wall" era Mike)

My senior year, my frat's winning show had a Thriller homage. The runners-up used that Smooth Criminal lean.

As I turn on video channels, read the news, you see so much love poured out for a man who tragically did not always feel this love in life. Even in this mourning, there are still those expressing their foolishness through tasteless headlines, ignorant facebook statuses; a barrage of tweets from twits. All revealing the hypocrisy so common in the human condition: a perverse readiness to dish out that which you'd never receive.

Michael Jackson was not a perfect man; like all of us he fought his demons but had the misfortune of wrestling in public. To those who still bash him and are quick to bring up his controversies, understand this: Nothing that you say can take away from his legacy.
Most of your heroes are complex and ALL of them have something they were ashamed of. If you have no reasons to mourn him, then you have even less reasons to tarnish his legacy. It is a shame that we often give flowers when the recipient can no longer smell them, (as a friend of mine remarks, we give flowers to the dead but no soup to the sick) and is cowardice to speak ill of one who is unable to retort.

Let's do more than play his music, let's listen to the words and express a love for one another that he undoubtedly possessed.

LinkEverything we dream of.

If you're new to Art Star, a Cavs fan, or find my beloved Knicks laughable, you may wonder why I am talking about Bron Bron in MSG a day before he begins feasting on the Orlando Magic.

Tonight is the night we learn where the Knicks pick (and I guess the other cellar dwellers are there too).

From all accounts this is a weaker draft than the last two (though, one can never be TOO sure on someone's potential...peace to Darko and Kwame Brown) but I'm still excited.

And guess what? I don't even want the number one pick.

That's right my fellow lotterarians, you can have Blake Griffin.

For that matter, keep Rubio, Thabeet, Jennings, and whoever else keeps Chad Ford awake at night.

All I'm saying is when I turn on MSG next season, all I'm trying to see is more of this:



Please believe this is the future. Anything else is unacceptable.

From Exit 30 to 34th St.

Stay thirsty my friends.

It's not as telling as you'd think.


Between us and Them.
It starts with a flicker of emotion, a spark doused with the treacherous solace of good Mexican beer. It takes but a sip to rewind the embers into a profound blaze of doubt and meticulous scrutiny of faults at once both invisible yet achingly overt.

You may feel like there’s a joke going around. Smiling peach faces and round cream bottoms always out of grasp, taunting in their appropriate imperfection. They’ve got the punch line under wraps and it’ll take more than Markovik to charm those lips open.

Tragically, you will soon come to terms with the reality. You will never be a part of that circle, for you were destined to remain outside, looking in through the coffee shop window. You will never understand what makes them so special, or their shitty music so appealing. You don’t have the stage presence for it.

Give up. You’ll be happier that way.

Dedicated to bad music.
It ends with a question. "How could you hate someone so adorable?" You'd like to tell her that it's easy. All you'd need was love.

He performed under the name Sheepskin Bogonis, his persona a ragged beard and matching, scraggly voice oscillating between nervous melody and Muppetish growl. Grover crying over a chai latte while masturbating into his copy of Gravity's Rainbow. 

Occasionally the veneer breaks (or maybe it just continues, who am I to tell?). He lets out a woman's giggle and adjusts his carefully unwashed bob. He tosses out self-deprecation like candy or Amyl.

With music like that, songs written in the posthumous honor of a grandmother, he's sure to get plenty of adoring "ooh's" and "ahh's," not so dissimilar from a family reacting to a vomiting newborn. At most one of his fellow suburbanites will bed him out of a fiendish blend of pity and painful boredom. She won't think anything of it. He's as threatening as a kitten.


I usually don't take on another person's post on this blog.

But this had been building inside me ever since I saw the quote C2toB took from a girls facebook status we both know:

"People who don't pray, inform, protest or care about what is happening in Gaza are complicite with the murder of innocent civilians."

I completely disagree.

In fact I think the more uncomfortable truth is that it is totally okay to not pray, inform, protest, or care about what is happening in Gaza.

Let's go back to the beginning.

We were all originally in a state of nature that we left when we entered into a contract to form civil society.

If you don't understand the previous sentence then please stop reading this post - there is nothing else that I can say that will change your mind from thinking I am just being a huge asshole.

Without going into a huge argument about what it means to be part of a civil society, and what exactly is the extent of the contract we make, lets just agree that there is some form of contract and we exist in some form of civil society.

The problem is that there is a limit to our civil society - namely you are only part of your own nation. And whereas there are many important moral arguments that can be made about individuals and their society; nation states are not individuals.
When nation states interact with each other - morality does not exist.

International relations, is, was, and always will be defined by power.

There is simply no other way.

So when another nation state attacks another nation state for the stregthening of its own people that it has a contract with to protect - no one save God can judge.

And the proper response should be looked at through the prism of how does this war effect American power, influence, and security in the region and at home.

However, do we have a moral obligation to care about the fact that people are dying in a war between two nation-states?

Absolutely not.

Now I will say that there is a difference between two civil societies figthing and a government that is breaking its contract to its people (genocide). In the latter case we do have a moral obligation to care because in this case they are weakening the bonds of civil society itself, which no nation can tolerate (or else we are all in danger of falling back into a state of nature).

However in the case of the former, in the case of a war between two nations, there is no such thing as an innocent civillain. You give up your right to be innocent when you enter your civil society. If you don't like your government you also have the right and responsibility to change it. But you have to bear the burden of your governments decision. It isn't fair but it is reality. (Which is why everyone should be outraged over the failings of the Bush administration, no matter if you supported or opposed Bush, we all have to deal with the consequences. Also this is why we should always do what we can to assist our own government no matter how we personally feel about its leaders. At the end of the day - people who hate America won't care how you voted ).

So, if you decided to watch the NFL playoffs, and you didn't pray, inform, protest, or care about Gaza - that is fine.

It is also great if you do care, pray, inform, or protest about Gaza.

On a personal level, I follow any conflict I become aware of rather closely because war interests me from a political science standpoint. I do pray for those in Gaza because I am religious and believe in the power of prayer.

However I don't believe that anyone who doesn't do this are morally bad people. I don't think Americans have an obligation to care about Gaza, and I definitely believe it is complete bullshit to suggest that a person is complicit in murder because they don't care about a war between two other nation states.

The Cowboys didn't make the playoffs so I'm not watching them this year, but for all of those who did, I hope you enjoyed the game.

And as much as it hurts, I can't even say I'm mad.


Don't get me wrong, this is by far the most demoralizing loss I've ever seen as a Cowboys fan and it's even more embarassing than Tony's blunder in Seattle.

Let's put this in perspective; this is the same team that was pretty much handed the Lombardi in the preseason, and once Brady went down and Manning's Colts had a lackluster start, there was a strong sentiment that the Superbowl was theirs to lose. Even though the Giants and Titans were tearing up the schedule, there was a sense that this was the Cowboys' season and they were throwing it away. 

After Sunday's 44-6 whoopin from the Eagles, consider it thrown. 

Funny how preseason hype (Favre to the Jets, Cowboys as unstoppable) means so little and when it comes down to it...all that matters is how the games are played.

Come on, did you expect to see this weekend's wildcard schedule look like THIS?

Atlanta at Arizona

You have the team who lost their franchise QB and was sooo bad last season that their coach jumped ship before the season ended versus a team that hadn't won a division title since Ford was in office.

I expect an incredibly high scoring game as the offenses on both clubs are potent. Arizona's defense is suspect and I don't expect them to prevail.

Prediction: ATL 34 ARI 20

Indy at San Diego

It disgusts me that San Diego can win their division and make the playoffs when good clubs like New England (11-5 and no playoffs! What?!) are on the outside looking in. I was mad earlier in the season about the NFC North and NFC West getting playoff positions but I don't support any of the NFC teams who didn't make it. (Including my Cowboys who are closer to winning a daytime Emmy than the Lombardi trophy)

I'm feeling the Colts right now (not jumping on the bandwagon, I'm just sayin, real recognize real) and expect them to stomp the life out of the Chargers in this matchup. 

I also wanna give Peyton Manning his props for winning his 3rd MVP trophy. Part of me wants to hate but honestly he is turning football into a one man sport every game he goes out there. And his commercials are getting funnier. Observe:


Prediction: Colts 17 Chargers 3

Baltimore at Miami

Dolphins fans have to be confused. Last year you have the Patriots threaten Don Shula and company from poppin champagne  (ohhhh) and your squad plays abominable football and now Parcells brings in former rival Chad Pennington and y'all win the division. 

Unbelievable. 

Don't front like you thought Brady and Favre would be watching Chad in January!

And they better tune in this weekend...cause I believe this will be a one and done affair for Miami this month.

The Ravens are doing their thing and I don't see Miami stopping them. Their defense is looking 2000esque and no one can deny Flacco has exceeded expectations. 

Don't expect this one to be a shootout though...in fact, you might just wanna follow this one on the ticker.

Prediction: Baltimore 10 Miami 6

Philly at Minnesota

This one is hard for me to call. 

I spent most of the season bashing the NFC North and making fun of my roommate for being a Vikings fan. His hatred for Brad Childress is hilarious and I might have to interview him on Art Star so y'all can feel his disdain.

Watching Philly play on Sunday, they were so focused. Granted, they were playing at home against a division rival for a shot at the playoffs BUT they were playing on a level I hadn't seen from them since the early 2000's when they used to win the division. (nightmares!)

You have two teams that frustrate their fan base because they have the potential to be much more. Coming off of solid and necessary wins, their respective readiness should be there. Minnesota is at home but they're really gonna need Adrian Peterson to be healthy and Tavaris not to mess up. (I'm begging you, and I don't even like y'all like that.)

With that said, Philly has the better defense, better coach, and better quarterback so I believe they will win. 

But it's just like Philly to lose the week I actually think they will win. 

Philly 19 Minnesota 10

I hate the Eagles.

Listen to the soundtrack of my nightmares:






Art Star pham,


I have something I need to get off my chest. Perhaps you too have noticed this for a while and I hope it bothers you. What I'm talking about is media outlets using black journalists and commentators to communicate messages saturated in oppression. So many of these articles I see on ESPN.com, video clips of D.L Hughley on CNN (with no one asking the obvious question...why is D.L Hughley on CNN?!), and the least of these...Chocolate News.

I remember cringing whenever I'd see Juan Williams on Fox News but held hope that he was just trying to destroy Fox News from the inside. Kinda like a double agent. Because honestly, can anyone really believe this:



But even if my hope is misguided and Juan Williams really does believe this nonsense, I don't think I could ever call him the most self-depricating black man in the media. After all, we all should get that Fox is about as fair and balanced as Zimbabwean politics

So who are the greater dangers out there? To me, it is much more devastating when the divisive and destructive messages are implicit. The much more compelling medium of entertaining news is employed and provides nothing but embarrassment. 




Now in a world where Daily Show and Colbert Report are critically acclaimed, entertaining, and informative, why do we have Chocolate News?!

I never thought I would see the day when Mind of Mencia would be supplanted as the worst show on Comedy Central, nor the day when Flavor of Love was no longer the most self-depricating show on television. This show is deplorable.


...right at the beginning. "Our first colored president."

Lohan FTW.

And now, I vent some steam.

NPR reported today that despite OPEC's decision to slash production by a drastic 1.5 million barrels a year, the market value of crude oil has continued its downward spiral (today landing at $64.51). They're attempting to shore up prices since currently a barrel sells for less than half of what it did back in July. I'll take that as a sign Western nations have finally said "f*ck you" to an oil-driven domestic energy strategy, as well as oil-producing nations (and companies) who have systematically reamed us up the wallet since last year. It signals a definite course correction in the mindset of Americans in particular.

We needed to see how bad it could get before we decided to make a change.

Thank for you that.

We laugh at you, sir. We laugh.



Though our attention is rightfully attuned to the dire state of our economy, nothing frightens me more when the people in charge, or in this case, potentially a "72 year old's heartbeat" away, don't know what's going on. It takes me back to childhood moments and the sense of peace that parents and all good guardians aim to provide. Even if they are freaking out, they must maintain stability. My Mom was unemployed for over a year and never let me feel the brunt of our situation. I couldn't imagine how scared I would have been if my Mom demonstrated a clear inability to deal and eventually overcome our circumstance.

Which brings me to Sarah Palin and her bizarre interview with Katie Couric. She reminded me of someone who had to give a presentation for class but forgot to read the book. Or maybe only read the back cover description and thought they could "wing it." Pulling words out of the air might work in your tenth grade English class, but this is straight embarrassing...

Matter of fact, Fareed Zakaria politely remarks that she needs to do herself a favor and bow out gracefully:



It probably took Tina Fey twelve minutes to write this sketch, half of which was merely copying down what Palin actually said:



Not everybody is laughing though. Matter of fact Jack Cafferty is righteously indignant. He might even slap somebody! Watch Wolf try to keep him cool at the end though...


You might think this is all exaggeration. Perhaps people are sexist, or the liberal media is at it again. Fine, suit yourself. But watch these clips and tell me you feel comfortable with her as second in command. I dare you to tell me that she sounds like someone who has a mere understanding of what we're going through.

Watch CBS Videos Online


Watch CBS Videos Online

Economics are probably the least understood aspect about our society so I can kind of understand Sarah's struggle. But I'm not trying to be Vice President of the United States right now. And if I were, please believe I would be well versed in what exactly we were going through so that I could sound intelligent and be a legit agent of change.

I'd love to hear from McCain supporters--if we haven't scared all y'all away--what are you thinking right now about Gov. Palin's blunders?



I'm not impressed.


Did anyone else notice Gov. Palin's screwface anytime she mentioned a point of contention? She put on a mean-mug anytime she mentioned the war, or her "opponent", or the countless references to McCain's torture.

(An aside on McCain: Allow me to begin with the obligatory preface that states my respect for all who have sacrificed in the name of our country. At what point will McCain supports stop pimping his experience in the Hanoi Hilton? Is torture going to be a prerequisite to the highest office of the land? If he wins, will McCain be the 50 Cent of politics? How many politicians are willing to subject themselves, or loved ones, to unfortunate circumstances for a chance at graduating the electoral college. Terrifying.)

I am frightened and cynically amused at the collective demeanor of the GOP in this season. While we face issues of great alarm, they cheer "USA, USA" at a hockey mom as if this was 1980. If their beef with the Dems is change without substance, then the biggest sin of the Republicans is stagnation and perpetual despair. 

Palin spoke about McCain's awful experience in Vietnam and recalled an episode where McCain, while being tortured or recooperating from his afflictions I am not quite sure, gave a thumbs up to a fellow soldier. She quickly quipped that this is the kind of President she wanted but I am, admittedly biased of course, hesitant. With so many issues that this country must face, do we need a leader who can grit his teeth and bare it or one who can inspire us to overcome our obstacles?

I can't help but think that the Republicans have fallen into the traditional role of hyperadversity. Since "Change" is interwoven with Obama's movement, I fear McCain is adopting a bit of Bush's "stay the course" rhetoric. For example, (just so you don't write this off as merely liberal ranting) I saw many signs and heard the cheers of "Drill, Baby, Drill" and quickly wrote this off as nonsense. One of my roomates, an undecided, claimed that Alaska has enough natural gas and oil to power America for the next sixty years. And this belief is bringing America its emancipation from foreign dependancy?! What about after the next sixty years? Are we to find the next band-aid to cover our gunshot wound? 

I cannot respect Palin's disrespectful view towards community organizing. Yes, yes I understand the power of sarcastic swiping and appreciate wit when it is actually good. But Palin's comments show that she did not attempt to solely make Obama's record illegitimate, but attacked the vocation of many brave Americans who are fighting our forgotten war on poverty. Instead, she made the position of mayor more important, and chockful of experience!, in spite of the numerous towns and cities where civil leadership has failed its people. If Obama's slight towards pistol packing parishioners made him elitist then Palin's stance is the error of a politician who is comfortably aloof. 

I looked forward to this speech tonight because I wanted to hear the voice of a candidate whose obscurity made her top news all week. I fear that instead of the woman who claims to shatter the glass ceiling Clinton could only crack, I heard an hour long speech that reminded me of a WWF promo. By the end I expected Obama to run on stage and give McCain the Rock Bottom. I don't ask much of the Republican party but I do wish that they would take this election more seriously. We aren't voting for "So You Think You Can Dance". Put aside political rhetoric and stale tactics and tell me whatcha gonna do!


Free Blog Counter